KakapoWP KakapoWP
Security

Solid Security vs. Kakapo Security: Hardening Compared

July 5, 2026·4 min read

Solid Security — formerly iThemes Security — and Kakapo Security solve the same task with different emphases. One is strong on login and hardening; the other adds a transparent scan and a log that shows whether it has been changed.

The short answer

Solid Security is an established tool with many hardening toggles, login protection, two-factor via authenticator apps, and a free version. It's widely used, well documented, and sufficient for most sites.

Kakapo Security brings the same basics — limiting failed attempts, moving the login URL, sessions, hardening — and adds a pattern firewall, a scan, and a chained log entry on top. Everything runs locally; nothing is queried for detection.

In short: if you need two-factor via an app and a free starting point, Solid Security is the obvious choice. If you want to read what it scans for and have a log that makes tampering visible, Kakapo Security is the better fit.

What both can do

Where the two differ

QuestionSolid SecurityKakapo Security
Pricefree, with a Pro tierpaid plugin, one license for nine
Two-factor authenticationAuthenticator app (TOTP)email code only
Pattern firewall in the plugincheck40 patterns, readable in the source code
Scan of wp-contentdepends on plan22 patterns, rejected approaches documented
Core files against the originalyesyes, against api.wordpress.org
Approving a findingpossibletied to the file's checksum
Tamper-proof log chain—yes, against a value from wp-config.php
Country block at logindepends on planbuilt in
Login window (times of day)—built in
Does anything go through the vendor?checkno

The most important difference: transparency

A security tool can only be judged if you know what it's looking for. In Kakapo Security, the firewall and scan patterns are in the shipped source code — along with a list of approaches that, when measured, produced too many false positives, each with its count.

That's not a marketing claim but something you can verify: the list is shown in the interface. If you want to know why a pattern is missing, you'll find the reasoning there instead of a gap.

Two security plugins at once aren't double security. They lock each other out, duplicate logs, and make every alert ambiguous. One is enough — set up correctly.

When Solid Security is the better choice

When Kakapo Security is the better choice

Switching: what to do

  1. Write down block lists, exceptions, and the custom login URL. The last one first — if you forget it, you'll lock yourself out.
  2. Install Kakapo Security and enter your license key.
  3. Set the firewall to “Monitor” and let it run alongside for a week.
  4. Go through the log and loosen rules that hit real traffic.
  5. Take a baseline of the files while the site is verifiably clean.
  6. Switch off the old plugin, and only then switch to “Block”.

Frequently asked questions

Will I lose my block lists?
Yes, block lists belong to each plugin. Write down the most important entries beforehand; most of them fill up again on their own within days anyway.
What about the custom login URL?
It belongs to the old plugin. Set it again in the new one — and keep the old URL at hand until the switch is complete.
Do I still need two-factor via an app?
If your policy requires it: yes, and then you'll need an additional plugin. Kakapo Security only provides email codes and says so openly in the interface.
What happens without a valid license?
Runs pause; baselines and logs are kept.

Kakapo Security — pay once, use forever.

All nine plugins for €149 once instead of €13 a month. Secure payment via Stripe. For the first 14 days: problem fixed or money back.

Get Lifetime All Features
Read more

You might also be interested in this.

All Posts